Quantcast University News
College Media Network

Current Issue:

President Lazarus condemns theft

Controversy is no excuse: "Theft is always wrong," says Lazarus

Sarah Crotty & John Bloch

Issue date: 2/19/08 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email
Students stare at the blank wall where the stolen print once hung.
Media Credit: Drew Johnson
Students stare at the blank wall where the stolen print once hung.

University of Dallas president Dr. Frank Lazarus said in an interview Monday he was deeply offended by a print of Our Lady of Guadalupe that had been placed on display in the university's art gallery, but he also expressed dismay that it apparently has been stolen by someone who had objected to the print's installation on campus.

During a conversation in his office, Dr. Lazarus discussed the circumstances surrounding the theft of the print, titled "Sinner or Saint," from the Upper Gallery of the Haggerty Art Village last Thursday afternoon.

He said he was away from campus when the print exhibition was opened to the campus for viewing and was made aware Wednesday afternoon that objections were being raised to its presence. That, Lazarus said, was when he went to the gallery to view it with three people-two from the art department and a member of his staff. The president described his reaction as "being offended by this particular print." Lazarus quickly questioned what plans and decisions had already been made regarding the print.

The print was one of 10 included in an art exchange that Murray State University sent to UD. In turn, UD sent 10 art works to Murray State.

Dick Dougherty, chair of the art department at Murray State, said he was informed of the theft over the weekend. He said the print had not caused any problems while on display at the school. He declined to add additional comment.

"There's a legitimate question of academic freedom here," said Dr. Lazarus. "There is a professor, who exercising his own legitimate expertise in the area of art, judged that this was of sufficient use to him as part of an exhibit to at least get some pedagogical value out of it."

"His purpose was to help his students understand how you look at something that is shocking and that might be offensive to you and critique it from the professional perspective of an artist. That's something important that artists have to know how to do," said Dr. Lazarus.

"People are going to place their personal reaction over the common good. That doesn't mean it's the common good to have a picture that desecrates a saint at a Catholic university. What it means is that you have to be careful about making that kind of a judgment," said Dr. Lazarus. "Rather than simply say 'That comes off the wall, take it away,' when you're responsible for a whole group of people and it's an academic exercise and I'm not an art professor, I have to hesitate and say we need to think more about this, we need to have a discussion about this and there are lots of ways we can approach this."
Page 1 of 4 next >

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 58

Trey

posted 2/20/08 @ 1:48 PM CST

What was the character of the print? I only know that it was "controversial" as the article did not describe the work.

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Trey

posted 2/22/08 @ 10:50 AM CST

I think whoever approved that should be fired on the spot.

(2 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Zeke

posted 2/23/08 @ 12:16 AM CST

What a sad situation. It's a complicated issue, but I can't believe the art department wasn't better prepared. The faculty should have been all over this as an opportunity to discuss the proper Christian response to such a painting - to any and all such work. (Continued…)

Zeke

posted 2/23/08 @ 2:47 AM CST

What a sad situation. But it is far from the black and white issue it's made out to be here. This is far from the type of phenomena plaguing Catholic universities in this country (eg: DePaul). (Continued…)

edmund

posted 2/23/08 @ 8:54 AM CST

Zeke,

You write, "and while so called academic freedom has limits..." So what are those limits? I mean here's a Catholic University that puts up a painting in a public space that is sacrilege. (Continued…)

(2 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Alum

posted 2/23/08 @ 10:40 AM CST

Both Lazarus and the art professor who coordinated this should be fired. If they want to work at a school where attacks on Catholicism are allowed, there are plenty of opportunities out there. (Continued…)

Laura Quinn

posted 2/23/08 @ 3:28 PM CST

It is very troubling to me, to see a school I loved deeply follow the trend of public fear of speaking out when something is just wrong. Part of what I learned when at UD 20 years ago was how to stand up for what is right. (Continued…)

Trey

posted 2/23/08 @ 11:07 PM CST

What's even more outrageous is this response by the Prez...

CATHOLIC CHARACTER, ACADEMIC FREEDOM, AND ARTISTIC EXPRESSION

[by Frank Lazarus, president, University of Dallas]

On February 8, 2008 a University of Dallas professor in the Art Department mounted in the Upper Art Gallery a collection of prints received in an exchange program with a public university in the Midwest. (Continued…)

Zeke

posted 2/25/08 @ 10:31 AM CST

It is so sad to read these responses. I can only hope that these ludicrous posts represent a fringe group of Christo-fascists and not the University as a whole. (Continued…)

Tom Lagarde

posted 2/25/08 @ 12:26 PM CST

Zeke,

What's a Christo-Fascist? You accuse those who believe that a painting of the Blessed Mother dressed as a stripper ought not hang on the public walls of a Catholic University of being "ludicrous" and perhaps generally over the top. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Advertisement