Quantcast University News
College Media Network

Current Issue:

Spotlight on Philosophy Colloquium

Parens lectures on the disadvantages of natural law theory

Zita Fletcher

Issue date: 2/9/10 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
Dr. Joshua Parens of the philosophy department challenges the assumption that man is subject to inherent natural law.
Media Credit: Zita Fletcher
Dr. Joshua Parens of the philosophy department challenges the assumption that man is subject to inherent natural law.

On Friday, a large assembly of undergraduates, graduate students and faculty members gathered in Braniff 201 to participate in the latest installment of the Philosophy Colloquium series, which featured a presentation by Dr. Joshua Parens entitled "Conventionalism, Natural Right and Natural Law."

In the tradition of an ancient Greek symposium, the group of more than 40 people attended the colloquium not only to hear a philosophical discourse, but also to contribute to it with their own questions, comments or observations. "I like the discussion that it sparks with students after the colloquium," said University of Dallas freshman Jessica Deal. She went on to explain that she liked being able to carry on the dialogue with her fellow students outside.

Parens' presentation challenged the traditional UD perspective that man is subject to an inherent natural law. Favoring the advantages of the natural right theory, adopted by notable figures such as Aristotle and John Locke, Parens reminded those present that he was not undermining the natural law theory but was merely suggesting disadvantages to it. "In claiming that laws are natural, one seems to insinuate that they're innate," said Parens. He added that by claiming the existence of a natural law, one is also insinuating the existence of a natural punishment.

The presentation, which referenced Muslim, Jewish and Christian medieval scholars, including Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas, also defined the theory of conventionalism. "The basic contrast that I'd like to draw is that conventionalism boils down to the rule of the strong," explained Dr. Parens. He reminded the audience of the Thrasymachus' conventionalist argument in Book I of Plato's "Republic."

After the presentation had drawn to a close, the room opened up for questions or comments, of which there were many. The observations of the students and faculty members created an environment conducive to intellectual dialogue and the exchange of ideas. Terrill Legueri, a Braniff graduate student new to colloquium, found it a rewarding experience. "I liked it," she said. "I thought it was a good introduction to the major themes of the problem of justice."

There are 10 remaining installments in the Philosophy Colloquium series, which takes place on Fridays from 3:30 to 4:30 p.m. in Braniff 201. It offers students the distinct UD experience of engaging in a philosophic discussion with one's fellows as well as with great thinkers across the centuries.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Be the first to comment on this story

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

How satisfied are you with your 2009-2010 University of Dallas school year?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement